Declaration of Interests by Rajya Sabha Member
DHOOT RAJKUMAR NANDLAL
MAHARASHTRA
Party:SHS
S/o|D/o|W/o: Dhoot Nandlal
Age: 58
Name Enrolled as Voter in: 108-Aurangabad (West) constituency, at Serial no 462 in Part no 207
Self Profession:Industrialist
Spouse Profession:Business
Crime-O-Meter
Number of Criminal Cases: 3
Educational Details
Category: 12th Pass
B.Com,2nd Year Passed From Saraswati Bhuvan College, Aurangabad-Marathwada University, year-1975
Details of PAN and status of Income Tax return
| Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
| self | Y | 2012 - 2013 | Rs 26,14,170 ~ 26 Lacs+ |
| spouse | Y | 2012 - 2013 | Rs 0 ~ |
| dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
| dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
| dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Data Readability Report of PAN and Income Tax :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
Details of Criminal Cases
Brief Details of IPC / BNS
- 1 charges related to Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder (IPC Section-364)
- 1 charges related to Murder (IPC Section-302)
- 1 charges related to Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender (IPC Section-201)
- 1 charges related to Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention (IPC Section-34)
- 1 charges related to House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint (IPC Section-452)
- 1 charges related to Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty (IPC Section-354)
- 1 charges related to Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace (IPC Section-504)
- 1 charges related to criminal intimidation (IPC Section-506)
Cases where Cognizance taken
| Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable |
| 1 | | Case No.1149/S/2002, The complaint is filed U/s 18(2), 18 (3) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1999 and section 73 read with Central Notification and read with section 68 (1) of the said act and read with section 56 (1)(i) and read with section 59 (3) (4) of FEMA 1999, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade Court, Mumbai, On 24/5/2002, I say that said proceedings were quashed and set aside by Hon'ble High Court of Judicature of Bombay in writ petition No.476/2005 which was filed by me. The complainant i.e. enforcement directorate challenged the matter before Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by filing Special Leave Petition bearing SLP (Criminal) No.5718/2006 and Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has set aside order passed by Hon'ble Bombay High Court and matter is remanded back to the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade Court, Mumbai for trial on merit from the stage of taking cognizance. Chief metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade Court, Mumbai after hearing Discharged all accused by order dated 29/5/2008. Said order of discharge has been challenged by Department before District & Sessions Judge, Mumbai by filing revision petition no. 716/2008, in which District and Sessions Judge ordered re-enquiry and remanded back the matter to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. Which order of remand for fresh enquiry is challenged by me in High Court of Judicature of Bombay in criminal petition No.497/2011, which is dismissed on 14.10.2013. We have challenged this dismissal order in Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SLP no. 40/2014 and which has come for hearing before Hon'ble Supreme Court on 10/01/2014, Supreme Court issued notices to the respondents and granted stay to this criminal case bearing CC No.1149/S/2002 pending before Hon'ble Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Espalande Court, Mumbai. | |
| 2 | 364, 302, 201, 34 | One Sangita w/o. Rajkishor Kunwar filed RCC No.1880/2012, Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railway Court), Aurangabad.
JMFC Court observed that since the allegations of offences are triable by Session Court hence Provision u/s.202 of CRPC become applicable at Pre Cognizance stage, hence complainant is directed to produce all witness, The complainant herself challenged aforesaid order Date 06.11.2012 in Criminal Rivision No.4/2013 same is pending before District and Session Court, Aurangabad.
| |
| 3 | 452, 354, 504, 506 | One Sangita Rajkishor Kunwar filed RCC No.2023/2013, 8 of MCACE, before JMFC, (Railway Court) Aurangabad. Court has passed order U/Sec.156(3) of CRPC On Date-31/8/2013,
Mukundwadi Police Aurangabad, have carried out Investigation and found allegation to be false and hence submitted B-Summary Report before JMFC Court. The matter is pending for order of the Court.
| |
Cases where convicted
| Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable |
| ---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
Details of Immovable Assets
| Sr No | Description | self | spouse | dependent1 | dependent2 | dependent3 |
| i | Agricultural Land | Dodha, Tal.Simga, Dist.Raipur, Chattisgarh, Khasra No.74/5-6, 75/2, 77, 81, 84/1-2,128/1, 129/2, 138, 142, 144/7, 144/9
Total Area 14.48 Acre
Built Up Area
Whether Inherited N
Purchase Date 1998-06-15
Purchase Cost 195000.00
Development Cost 0.00 2,95,700 2 Lacs+
Dongaria, Tal.Simga, Dist.Raipur, Chattisgarh, Khasra No.187, 198, 191/2,192/2,197/1,193, 206,196,201/14, 201/5,201/13,201/2, 201/12, 201/6-7, 188,192/1,192/3,201/15
Total Area 27.84 Acre
Built Up Area
Whether Inherited N
Purchase Date 1998-05-22
Purchase Cost 360000.00
Development Cost 0.00 5,47,400 5 Lacs+
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Rs 8,43,100 8 Lacs+ |
| ii | Non Agricultural Land | Ahmednagar, Plot No.C & D/1-2 of Finacl Plot No.42, TP III (Part Only)
Total Area 19950 Sq.Ft.
Built Up Area
Whether Inherited Y
Purchase Date 0000-00-00
Purchase Cost 0.00
Development Cost 0.00 25,62,100 25 Lacs+
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Rs 25,62,100 25 Lacs+ |
| iii | Commercial Buildings | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| iv | Residential Buildings | Gangapur Gin Compound, Station Road, Ahmednagar (Undivided 1/4th Share), Survey no.42/B, TP-III, 1/4th Share of 5000 Sq.Ft.
Total Area 1250 Sq.Ft.
Built Up Area 1250 Sq.Ft.
Whether Inherited Y
Purchase Date 0000-00-00
Purchase Cost 0.00
Development Cost 0.00 6,35,300 6 Lacs+
2275, Adate Bazar, Ahmednagar(Undivided Share), Survey NO.1376, 1/4th Share of 2428 Sq.Ft.
Total Area 607 Sq.Ft.
Built Up Area 607 Sq.Ft.
Whether Inherited Y
Purchase Date 0000-00-00
Purchase Cost 0.00
Development Cost 0.00 25,53,800 25 Lacs+
Aurangabad, Survey No.19415/A-1
Total Area 4000 Sq.Ft.
Built Up Area 3330 Sq.Ft.
Whether Inherited Y
Purchase Date 0000-00-00
Purchase Cost 0.00
Development Cost 0.00 1,34,01,000 1 Crore+
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Rs 1,65,90,100 1 Crore+ |
| v | Others | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Total Current Market Value of (i) to (v) (as per Affidavit) | 1,99,95,300 1 Crore+ | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Rs 1,99,95,300 1 Crore+ |
| Totals Calculated | Rs 1,99,95,300 1 Crore+ | Nil
| Nil
| Nil
| Nil
| Rs 1,99,95,300 1 Crore+ |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
Details of Liabilities
| Sr No | Description | self | spouse | dependent1 | dependent2 | dependent3 |
| i | Loans from Banks / FIs | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Loans due to Individual / Entity | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Any other Liability | Nil | Tekcare India Pvt.ltd. 1,65,08,742 1 Crore+
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Rs 1,65,08,742 1 Crore+ |
| Grand Total of Liabilities (as per affidavit) | Nil | 1,65,08,742 1 Crore+ | Nil | Nil | Nil | Rs 1,65,08,742 1 Crore+ |
| ii | Dues to departments dealing with government accommodation | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Dues to departments dealing with supply of water | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Dues to departments dealing with supply of electricity | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Dues to departments dealing with telephones | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Dues to departments dealing with supply of transport | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Income Tax Dues | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Wealth Tax Dues | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Service Tax Dues | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Property Tax Dues | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Sales Tax Dues | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Any Other Dues | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| iii | Grand Total of all Govt Dues (as per affidavit) | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| iv | Whether any other liabilities are in dispute, if so, mention the amount involved and the authority before which it is pending | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil
|
| Totals (Calculated as Sum of Values) | Nil
| Rs 1,65,08,742 1 Crore+ | Nil
| Nil
| Nil
| Rs 1,65,08,742 1 Crore+ |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
If you notice any discrepancy between affidavits and our data, you can use the message box below to send a message to us.
( यदि आप हलफनामों और इस पेज पर दी गयी जानकारी के बीच कोई विसंगति/भिन्नता पाते है तो आप नीचे के संदेश बॉक्स के उपयोग से हमें संदेश भेज सकते हैं)
Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.