Cuttack Constituency Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates

1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:Cuttack

Generated Wednesday 24th of April 2024 04:53:25 PM

Name	Age	Gender	Party Code	Criminal Cases	No. of Cases	Education Level	Movable Assets	Immovable Assets	Total Assets	Total Liabilities	PAN Given (Y or N)
Anadi Sahu	68	M	BJP	No	0	Graduate	2,43,000 ~ 2 Lacs+	41,00,000 ~ 41 Lacs+	43,43,000 ~ 43 Lacs+	3,00,000 ~ 3 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Bhartruhari Mahtab	51	M	BJD	No	0	Post Graduate	1,75,55,909 ~ 1 Crore+	3,32,37,922 ~ 3 Crore+	5,07,93,831 ~ 5 Crore+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Debananda Singh	33	M	IND	No	0	10th Pass	0 ~	0 ~	0 ~	0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Gopal Chandra Kar	63	M	BSP	Yes	1	Graduate Professional	1,27,91,963 ~ 1 Crore+	45,80,000 ~ 45 Lacs+	1,73,71,963 ~ 1 Crore+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 4 IPC Details* criminal breach of trust(406), Habitually dealing in stolen property(413), Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420), Forgery for purpose of cheating(468), Punished for mischief(426), forgery(465), Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Kapila Charan Mall	72	M	BOP	No	0	Graduate	5,26,200 ~ 5 Lacs+	47,50,000 ~ 47 Lacs+	52,76,200 ~ 52 Lacs+	1,50,000 ~ 1 Lacs+	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Pradip Routray	40	M	Kalinga Sena	No	0	10th Pass	67,300 ~ 67 Thou+	0 ~	67,300 ~ 67 Thou+	0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*

*406 criminal breach of trust , 413 Habitually dealing in stolen property , 420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 431 Mischief by injury to public road, bridge, river or channel , 451 House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating , 506 criminal intimidation , 34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 143 Being member of an unlawful assembly , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 283 Danger or obstruction in public way or line of navigation , 353 Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty , 426 Punished for mischief , 465 forgery , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from Cuttack constituency (ORISSA).

Share On:

Download App

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs