Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:NAGPUR CENTRAL
Generated Monday 25th of November 2024 09:25:10 PM
Name |
Age |
Party Code |
Criminal Cases |
Education Level |
Movable Assets |
Immovable Assets |
Total Assets |
Total Liabilities |
PAN Given (Y/N) |
ANNES MAJID AHMED |
42 |
INC |
No
|
Post Graduate |
|
25,30,000 ~ 25 Lacs+ |
|
28,33,056 ~ 28 Lacs+ |
Y |
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* |
DAYASHANKAR CHANDRASHEKHAR TIWARI |
40 |
BJP |
Yes
2 |
Post Graduate |
|
33,00,000 ~ 33 Lacs+ |
|
0 ~ |
N |
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34), Punishment(143), Rioting, armed with deadly weapon(148), Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object(149), Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty(353), criminal breach of trust(406), Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent(409), Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420), Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.(467), Forgery for purpose of cheating(468), |
*34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 143 Punishment , 148 Rioting, armed with deadly weapon , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 353 Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty , 406 criminal breach of trust , 409 Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent , 420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 467 Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04
Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from NAGPUR CENTRAL constituency (Nagpur).
Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.