Myneta.info is an open data repository platform of Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR).
Myneta Logo Myneta Logo
Home Lok Sabha State Assemblies Rajya Sabha Political Parties Electoral Bonds || माय नेता हिंदी में || About MyNeta About ADR
State Assemblies Rajya Sabha Political Parties
1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:Kaij (SC)

Generated Friday 22nd of November 2024 04:31:19 PM
Name Age Party Code Criminal Cases Education Level Movable Assets Immovable Assets Total Assets Total Liabilities PAN Given
(Y/N)
Dr. Sitendra Baguji Satpute 38 IND No

Graduate 5,00,000
~ 5 Lacs+
7,500
~ 7 Thou+
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Dr. Sou. Vimaltai Nandkishore Mundada 47 NCP No

Graduate Professional 5,85,21,274
~ 5 Crore+
2,16,62,357
~ 2 Crore+
Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Gadsinge Harshwardhan Laxman 38 IND Yes

4
8th Pass 0
~
25,000
~ 25 Thou+
N
Serious IPC Counts: 5
IPC Details*
Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty(332),
Mischief by injury to public road, bridge, river or channel(431),
House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint(452),
Statements conducing to public mischief(505),
criminal intimidation(506),
Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34),
Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment-if offence be not committed(116),
Being member of an unlawful assembly(143),
Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions(186),
Threat of injury to public servant(189),
Obscene acts and songs(294),
voluntarily causing hurt(323),
Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty(353),
Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace(504),
Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman(509),
Hajare Radhesh Goroba 42 IND No

12th Pass 0
~
Nil 0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Jagarkar Anant Shankarrao 66 IND Yes

2
Graduate Professional 86,00,000
~ 86 Lacs+
41,18,507
~ 41 Lacs+
Y
Serious IPC Counts: 4
IPC Details*
House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment(451),
Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine(474),
Falsification of accounts(477A),
criminal intimidation(506),
Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34),
voluntarily causing hurt(323),
same offence when committed by person entrusted with custody(462),
forgery(465),
Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace(504),
Janabai Shesherao Wede 55 IND No

Literate 10,00,000
~ 10 Lacs+
0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Kale Madhukar Dagadu 54 IND No

10th Pass 2,00,000
~ 2 Lacs+
3,00,000
~ 3 Lacs+
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Kamble Pralhad Chokhajirao 62 IND No

12th Pass 0
~
0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Shivaji Shankarrao Shinde 59 IND No

12th Pass 20,00,000
~ 20 Lacs+
0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Tangade Balasaheb Sitaram 39 IND No

5th Pass 2,00,000
~ 2 Lacs+
0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Waghmare Manik Baburao 34 IND No

10th Pass 0
~
0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Wede Vijaykumar Rajaram 31 BSP No

5th Pass 0
~
Nil 0
~
N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*

*332 Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty , 367 Kidnapping or abducting in order to subject person to grievous hurt, slavery, etc. , 431 Mischief by injury to public road, bridge, river or channel , 451 House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment , 452 House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint , 467 Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating , 474 Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine , 477A Falsification of accounts , 505 Statements conducing to public mischief , 506 criminal intimidation , 34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 116 Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment-if offence be not committed , 143 Being member of an unlawful assembly , 186 Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions , 189 Threat of injury to public servant , 294 Obscene acts and songs , 323 voluntarily causing hurt , 353 Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty , 427 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees , 462 same offence when committed by person entrusted with custody , 465 forgery , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record , 479 Property mark , 504 Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace , 509 Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from Kaij (SC) constituency (BEED).

Share On:
Download App Follow us on

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs