Self Profession:Poltician
Spouse Profession:Govt Employee
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
spouse | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent1 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent2 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent4 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent5 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | S.T.(VIG)Case.no.02 of 2009 (05 of 2013) | The Special Judge (PC ACT) Sikkim Gangtok | 403, 120B(2), 403,406 | Section 13(2)13(1)(d)(ii)of The PC Act 1988. | I was convicted under Section 13(2) Read With Section 13(1)(d)(ii)of The PC Act,1988 & Sentenced to Undergo Simple Imprisonment For A Period Of One Year & To Pay A Fine Of RS 10000, For The Offence Under Sec-403 IPC ,I Was Sentenced to Undergo Simple Imprisonment For A Period Of One Year & For The Offence Under Sec- 120B(2) Read With Sec-403, 406 IPC, I Was Sentenced To Undergo Simple Imprisonment For A Period Of Six Months .The Aforestated Sentences Were Directed To run Concurrently. | 28 Dec 2016 | Yes | An Appeal Was Preferred In The High Court Of Sikkim .Gangtok & Same Was Registered As CRL. A. NO.01 Of 2017.However The Conviction & Sentence Was Affirmed & Upheld Vide Judgment Dated 28.06.2017, Against The Impugned Final Judgment & Order Dated 28.06.2017 In CRL. A. NO. 01 Of 2017 Passed by The High Court Of Sikkim At Gnagtok A Special Leave Petition Was Filed Before The Supreme Court Of India Same Being Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s) 32346/2017 However The Special Leave Petition Too Was Vide Order Dated 10.11.2017 |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.