Self Profession:MLA-APLA & Polictician & Farmer
Spouse Profession:Other Business (Invest in Firms)
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 24,65,177 ~ 24 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 27,57,810 ~ 27 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 18,71,760 ~ 18 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 49,65,701 ~ 49 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 45,92,726 ~ 45 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 59,89,740 ~ 59 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 61,09,790 ~ 61 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 60,49,410 ~ 60 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 94,62,054 ~ 94 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 63,51,615 ~ 63 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 25 of 2023 Kuppam P S Kuppam Chittoor Kuppam Chittoor District | Honorable Judicial First Class Magistrate Kupppam | 153 | Yes | 25 Jan 2024 | No | ||||
2 | 132 of 2022 of I Town PS Srikakulam | CC No 282 of 2022 | Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court Srikakulam | 353, 109, 34 | No | No | ||||
3 | 213 of 2021 Tekkali PS Tekkali Srikakulam District | Stay orders from High Court | 143, 341, 279, 283, 149 | Sec: 8(B) of the National Highway Act 1956, Section 129, 190(2), 119/184, 122 r/w 177 of Motor Vehicle Act 1988 | No | No | ||||
4 | 88 of 2021 Narasaraopeta II Town PS Palnadu District | 188, 505(1)B, 505(2), 153A | Sec: 54 of Disaster Management Act 2005 | No | No | |||||
5 | 44 of 2021 of Kotabommali PS Srikakulam Distrct | C.No.71/D2-DCRB/SKL/2024 | 147, 148, 324, 307, 384, 506, 341, 120B, 109, 188, 149 | Sec 123 of the Representation of People Act 1951 & Section 212 of A P Panchayatraj Act 1994, Charge Sheet Filed on 05.12.2023 | No | No | ||||
6 | 29 of 2021 of CID PS Mangalagiri Andhra Pradesh | Honorable Court of the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases -cum- Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. | 166, 167, 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 201, 109, 120B | Sec: 13(2), 13(1)(c) &(d) of prevention of Corruption Act 1988, Charge Sheet Filed on 04.04.2024 | No | No | ||||
7 | 03 of 2021 of Santhabommali PS Srikakulam District | CC No 325/2022 | The Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Kotabommali | 153a, 295a, 120B, 504, 34 | Yes | 22 Aug 2022 | No | |||
8 | 01 of 2021 of Nellimarla PS Nellimarla Vizianagaram District | 307, 326, 427, 503, 506, 323, 120B, 34 | Sec 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act 1984 | No | No | |||||
9 | 46 of 2020 of Airport PS Visakhapatnam | Sec: 151 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 | No | No | ||||||
10 | 04/RCO-CIU-ACB/2020 Anti Corruption Bureau Vijayawada | Honorable Special Court for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada | 409, 420, 120B | Sec: 13(1)(c),(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 1988, Sec: 13(1)(a) , 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018 | No | No | ||||
11 | 517 of 2019 of Tadepalli PS Guntur District | 341, 188, 353, 506 | No | No | ||||||
12 | 208 of 2019 of Tekkali PS Tekkali Srikakulam Dst (This Case was transferred from Tekkali PS to Guntur Urban Dst) | 353, 506(2), 188 | No | No | ||||||
13 | 34 of 2007 of D Herehal PS Ananthapuram Dst | CC no 119/2009 & CC No 50/2018 | Honorable MPs/MLAs Special Court Vijayawada | 143, 188, 447, 186, 506, 149 | Yes | 25 Mar 2021 | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.