Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:CHABUA

Generated Tuesday 31st of January 2023 01:04:52 PM
Name Age Gender Party Code Criminal Cases Number of Cases Serious IPC Counts IPC Details* Education Level Movable Assets Immovable Assets Total Assets Total Liabilities PAN Given
(Y or N)
Ajoy Phukan 33 M INC No 0 0 Graduate 8,83,663
~ 8 Lacs+		 0
~ 		8,83,663
~ 8 Lacs+		 0
~ 		Y
Ananta Hazarika 51 M LJP No 0 0 10th Pass 9,45,000
~ 9 Lacs+		 8,00,000
~ 8 Lacs+		 17,45,000
~ 17 Lacs+		 0
~ 		Y
Bhaben Baruah 61 M IND Yes 1 3 Punishment for extortion(384), Forgery for purpose of cheating(468), Punishment for criminal intimidation(506), Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34), Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B), Punishment for wrongful Confinement(342), 12th Pass 31,25,607
~ 31 Lacs+		 1,65,00,000
~ 1 Crore+		 1,96,25,607
~ 1 Crore+		 35,50,000
~ 35 Lacs+		 Y
Lawrance Nag 36 M IND Yes 1 1 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420), 12th Pass 1,39,150
~ 1 Lacs+		 5,50,000
~ 5 Lacs+		 6,89,150
~ 6 Lacs+		 0
~ 		Y
Ponakan Baruah 55 M AGP No 0 0 Graduate 1,22,95,572
~ 1 Crore+		 13,70,000
~ 13 Lacs+		 1,36,65,572
~ 1 Crore+		 10,34,024
~ 10 Lacs+		 Y
Prakash Tanti 49 M Rashtriya Lok Samta Party No 0 0 10th Pass 3,12,414
~ 3 Lacs+		 0
~ 		3,12,414
~ 3 Lacs+		 0
~ 		Y
Priyanka Neog 38 F IND No 0 0 Graduate 8,47,550
~ 8 Lacs+		 19,50,000
~ 19 Lacs+		 27,97,550
~ 27 Lacs+		 80,000
~ 80 Thou+		 Y

*384 Punishment for extortion , 420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating , 506 Punishment for criminal intimidation , 34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 342 Punishment for wrongful Confinement
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from CHABUA constituency (DIBRUGARH).

Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.