BARHAMPUR Constituency Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates

1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:BARHAMPUR

Generated Monday 6th of April 2026 12:04:04 PM

Name	Age	Party Code	Criminal Cases	Education Level	Immovable Assets	Total Liabilities	PAN Given (Y/N)
Jitu Goswami	55	BJP	Yes 3	12th Pass	16,31,00,000 ~ 16 Crore+	5,84,67,370 ~ 5 Crore+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 8 IPC Details* Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent(409), Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420), Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.(467), Forgery for purpose of cheating(468), Falsification of accounts(477A), Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B), Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Mazibur Rahman	55	All India United Democratic Front	No	Post Graduate	25,00,000 ~ 25 Lacs+	19,23,531 ~ 19 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Nazrul Islam	49	IND	No	Graduate	30,00,000 ~ 30 Lacs+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Rajen Gohain	75	Assam Jatiya Parishad	Yes 2	Graduate Professional	3,19,25,000 ~ 3 Crore+	40,25,427 ~ 40 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34), When such an act is criminal by reason of its being done with a criminal knowledge or intention(35), Defamation(499), Punishment for Defamation(500), Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory(501),
Ranumai Teronpi	51	AAP	Yes 8	10th Pass	1,09,15,380 ~ 1 Crore+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 19 IPC Details* Punishment for criminal breach of trust(406), Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent(409), Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420), Forgery for purpose of cheating(468), Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B), Punishment for cheating(417), Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss may ensue to person whose interest offender is bound to protect(418), Punishment for cheating by personation(419), Punishment for forgery(465), Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),

*406 Punishment for criminal breach of trust , 409 Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent , 420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 467 Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating , 477A Falsification of accounts , 34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 35 When such an act is criminal by reason of its being done with a criminal knowledge or intention , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 417 Punishment for cheating , 418 Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss may ensue to person whose interest offender is bound to protect , 419 Punishment for cheating by personation , 465 Punishment for forgery , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record , 499 Defamation , 500 Punishment for Defamation , 501 Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from BARHAMPUR constituency (NAGAON).

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs