Self Profession:Member of Legislative Assembly of NCT of Delhi. :
Spouse Profession:Social Work
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 12,32,160 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 13,39,068 ~ 13 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 14,29,530 ~ 14 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 14,00,210 ~ 14 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 9,47,294 ~ 9 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 22,30,940 ~ 22 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 21,83,761 ~ 21 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 22,95,670 ~ 22 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 20,82,750 ~ 20 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 24,91,400 ~ 24 Lacs+ |
huf | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 2,88,360 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 3,08,300 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 3,16,110 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 4,00,450 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 4,38,800 ~ 4 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Police Station Tilak Nagar Marg State of NCT of Delhi | Ct. Case No. 25/2021 | Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi | IPC | 499, 500, 504 | Section 200 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 | No | Yes | YES, Petition Filed Before The Honble High Court Of Delhi In The Case Titled Vijender Gupta V. State (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. CRL. M.C NO. 3467/2022 Seeking Quashing Of The Summoning Order And Consequential Proceedings The Emanating Therefrom Pending Before The Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi. | ||
2 | Police Station Tilak Nagar Marg State of NCT of Delhi | Complaint Case No. 15/2021 | Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi | IPC | 499, 501 | Section 200 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 | No | Yes | YES, Petition filed before the Honble High Court of Delhi in the case titled Vijender Gupta V. State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. Crl. M.C No. -2964/2021 seeking quashing of the summoning Order issued by the Ld. Additional Chief Magistrate, Rouse District Complex, Delhi. Judicial Ld. Avenue Court New | ||
3 | Police Station Tilak Nagar Marg State of NCT of Delhi | Complaint Case No. 05/2021 | Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi | IPC | 500, 34 | Section 200 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 | No | Yes | YES, Petition filed before the Honble High Court of Delhi in the case Titled Ramvir Singh Bidhuri V. Delhi Jal Board & ORS. CRL. M.C NO. -3185/2021 seeking quashing of the summoning and consequential proceedings Order the emanating therefrom pending before the Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi | ||
4 | Police Station Tilak Nagar Marg State of NCT of Delhi | Ct. Case No 17/2019 | Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi | IPC | 499, 500, 501, 502, 34, 35 | Section 199/200 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 | No | Yes | YES, Petition Filed Before The Honble High Court Of Delhi In The Case Titled Sh. Vijender Gupta V. Imran Hussain & Ors. Crl. Mc No. - 833/2021 Seeking Quashing Of The Summoning Order And The Entire Criminal Proceedings Pending Before The Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Ld. Rouse Avenue District Court Complex, New Delhi |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.