Self Profession:Political Activist/ MLA, Model Town (AC-18) NCT of Delhi
Spouse Profession:House Wife & Home Tutor
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Delhi 2020 | Rs15,39,814 ~15 Lacs+ | 4 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 7,04,830 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 4,79,900 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 4,93,480 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 4,90,920 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 4,99,460 ~ 4 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 4,97,450 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 4,94,350 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 3,33,090 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 2,41,300 ~ 2 Lacs+ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | P.S. Civil Lines | 4/2019 | Name of Court-Sh. Ravindra Kumar Pandey ACMM/RADC New Delhi, Discharged on Merit and Case Bearing No.CRL.L.P No.325/2022, Appeal/Revision Filed by the Complainant Before Honble Delhi High Court | IPC | 420 | Yes | 09 Jan 2020 | Yes | |||
2 | 292/2019, P.S.-Adarsh Nagar | Chargesheet not filed as yet howeve it involves MLA, Chargesheet will be filed in RADC Complex as per Honble Supreme Court Order | IPC | 186, 353, 332, 34 | No | No | |||||
3 | 11/2022, PS.-ACB | Chargesheet Not filed as yet | IPC | 171B, 171E | Section-7A/13 PCC Act | No | No | ||||
4 | Lokayukta, NCT of Delhi | 3842/LOK/2018/5730 | Justice Harish Chand Mishra, Lokayukta, NCT of Delhi | IPC | Under the Lokayukta Act | Yes | 06 Nov 2023 | No | |||
5 | 559/24, P.S.-Model Town | Chargesheet Not filed | BNS | 221, 132, 121(1), 3(5) | No | No | |||||
6 | 537/20, P.S.-Civil Lines | Chargesheet Not filed | IPC | 186, 353, 332, 34 | No | No | |||||
7 | 261/20, P.S.-Kamla Market | Chargesheet Not filed as yet | IPC | 186, 353, 332, 188, 269, 34 | Section-3 E.D. Act | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | SC No.-01/2021, FIR No.84/2020 | Ms. Geetanjali Goel, ASJ/Spl. Judge (PC Act) CBI RADC/New Delhi | IPC | 323 | Section-3(i)(r)(s) SC/ST Act & U/s. 323/341/506/34 IPC but Convicted only U/s.323 | Till Rising of Court and Pay a Compensation of Rs.30000/- out of which Rs.6500/- To be Deposited Towards Proceedings and Rest to The Complainant | 17 May 2023 | No | ||
2 | 33/2019, FIR No.236/2015 | Ms. Geetanjali Goel, ASJ/Spl. Judge (PC Act) CBI RADC/New Delhi | IPC | 332, 149 | U/s. 147/186/332/506, Section-3 of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Read with Section 149 IPC but Convicted only U/s-332 IPC Read with Section 149 of IPC | Till Rising of Court and Fine of Rs.10000/- | 03 Jul 2023 | No | ||
3 | SC.No.04/2019, FIR No.260/2013 | Ms. Geetanjali Goel, ASJ/Spl. Judge (PC Act) CBI (MPs MLA Case) RADC/New Delhi | IPC | 147, 186, 353, 332, 333, 149 | Section-1,3 of The Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 | Released on Three Month Probation bond and Rs.6150/- Cost of Proceeding, U/s of Probation of Offenders Act-1958 | 22 Sep 2021 | No |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.