Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Home Tutor
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 13,92,260 ~ 13 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 32,75,320 ~ 32 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 10,96,440 ~ 10 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 9,70,550 ~ 9 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 11,71,340 ~ 11 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2023 - 2024 | 2023 - 2024 ** Rs 6,96,560 ~ 6 Lacs+ 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 4,95,800 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 1,84,790 ~ 1 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 2,55,700 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 4,79,880 ~ 4 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 20 Dates 18.10.2005, Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Hisar (Anti Corruption Bureau, Hisar) | PC/16 of 2023 | Session Judge Hisar | IPC | 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B | Section 13(1)(D) & 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act. | No | Yes | CWP No. 13397 of 2024 titled as Dr. Sarita Malik versus State of Haryana and another is pending before the Honorable High Court of Punjab & Haryana filed by Dr. Sarita Malik |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 30/2 of 2013 | Sh. Jitendra Kumar, Judicial Magistrate first Class Court No. 2, Nalagarh District Solan HP | IPC | 143, 341, 147, 148, 149, 353, 332, 324, 435 | Section 3,4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. 1984 | (i) 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 148 IPC. (ii) 6 months imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- u/s 143 IPC. (iii) 1 month imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/- u/s 341 IPC. (iv) 2 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 147 IPC. (v) 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 324 IPC. (vi) 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 332 IPC. (vii) 2 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 353 IPC. (viii) 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 435 IPC. (ix) 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 3 of Prevention of damage to Public Property Act, 1984. (x) 3 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. | 14 Jan 2021 | Yes | (i) Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2021 pending before the Honble Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) case titled as Pardeep Chaudhary versus State of Himachal Pradesh Pending for 14.10.2024, (ii) Criminal Revision No. 66 of 2021 decided on 19.04.2021 by the Honble High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla vide which the Honble High Court was pleased to stay the conviction of Pardeep Chaudhary in FIR No. 149 dated 13.06.2011, Police Station Baddi, District Solan (H.P.) and modified the orders passed by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Solan camp at Nalagarh, District Solan (H.P.) in Application No. 21/2021 filed in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2021 titled as Pardeep Chaudhary versus State of Himachal Pradesh., (Quantum of Sentence Passed on 28.01.2021) |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.