Self Profession:Educationist, Founder-Chancellor of SRM UniversityFounder President IJK Party ,Social Service
Spouse Profession:Educationist
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Loksabha 2014 | Rs77,69,48,435 ~77 Crore+ | 1 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 81,31,997 ~ 81 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 45,39,741 ~ 45 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 52,26,832 ~ 52 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 64,00,503 ~ 64 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 5,73,27,485 ~ 5 Crore+ |
spouse | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 20,29,160 ~ 20 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 13,69,175 ~ 13 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 14,55,155 ~ 14 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 12,32,219 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 6,21,441 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | C.C.No.1032/2017 | VII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai. | Sec.138, 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act | No | Yes | In Crl O.P N o - 10081 of 2017 and Crl M.P. No -6675 of 2017 against C.C. No 1032 of 20l7. (stayed by the Honble high court of madras pending disposal of the Quash Petition | ||||
2 | C.C.No.5734/2016 | Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Fast Track-1, Allikulam, Chennai (now pending before XIX Metropolitan Magistrate Court Chennai). | Sec.138, 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act | No | Yes | In Crl. O.P No 25728 of 2016 and Crl. M.P. No - 12561 of 2016 against C.C. No 5734 of 2016. (stayed by the Honble high court of madras pending disposal of the Quash Petition |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.