Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Business
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Andhra Pradesh 2014 | Rs1,56,12,016 ~1 Crore+ | 12 |
Andhra Pradesh 2009 | Rs98,54,260 ~98 Lacs+ | 1 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 12,50,858 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 12,03,844 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 9,99,892 ~ 9 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 8,55,555 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 6,61,990 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 9,08,038 ~ 9 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 7,25,157 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 7,68,052 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 7,10,020 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent1 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent2 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent3 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 4/2011 Naupada Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | PRC NO. 11/2017 | Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kotabommali | 447, 148, 353, 441, 506, 120B, 307, 149 | No | No | ||||
2 | 12/2011 Naupada Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | S. C. No. 124/18 | Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Tekkali, Srikakulam Dis. | 147, 148, 307, 332, 353, 120B, 149 | Section 3 & 5 of PDP Act and Section 7(1)(d) of Criminal Amendment Act | No | No | |||
3 | 4/2011, Santhabommali Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | P. RC. No. 12/12 | Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kotabommali, Srikakulam Dist. | 147, 148, 120B, 307, 353, 341, 506, 149 | Yes | No | ||||
4 | 16/2011 Naupada Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | P. R. C. No. 1/14 | Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kotabommali, Srikakulam Dist. | 147, 148, 307, 435, 436, 332, 353, 120B, 149 | Section 3 of PDP Act | No | No | |||
5 | 67/2019 Tekkali Police Station, Tekkali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | Under investigation not taken cognizance by JFCM Court | JFCM Court, Tekkali | 188, 171H | Section 182 (a) MV Act | No | No | |||
6 | 155/2018 Tekkali Police Station, Tekkali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | Under investigation not taken cognizance by JFCM Court | JFCM Court, Tekkali | 143, 341, 149 | No | No | ||||
7 | 51/2018, Santhabommali Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | Under investing not taken cognizance by JFCM Court Kotabommali | JFCM Court Kotabommali | 341, 353, 34 | No | No | ||||
8 | 51/2015 Tekkali Police Station, Tekkali Mandal Srikakulam Dist. | C. C. No. 222/2015 | JFCM Court, Tekkali | 420, 323, 384, 379, 506, 34 | Section 156(3) Crpc | No | No | |||
9 | C. C. No. 215/2016 By A. D. Mines Tekkali | C. C. No. 215/2016 | JFCM Court, Tekkali | Section 15 Environment Protection Act 1986, Violance of Environment | No | No | ||||
10 | G. R. No. 28/2007 Parlakimidi Police Satation Odissa | C. C. No. 12 | Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate Court, Parlakimidi, Gajapathi Dist. Odissa | 468, 471, 34 | Section 12 of Odisha Minerals Prevention of Theft Smuggling and Unlawful Actives Act 1989 | No | No | |||
11 | 2(c) CC 9/10 | 2(c) CC 9/10 | Sub divisional Magistrate Parlakimidi Gajapathi Dist. Odisha | PR U/Section 22 of M. M(D&R) Act 1957 and Rule 68-1 (ii) OMMC Rule- 2004 | No | No | On appeal the High Court of Odhissa stayed the proceedings vide . 4167/2001 order dated 29.11.2011 | |||
12 | G. R. No. 37/12 Vigilance Berhampur | G. R. No. 37/12 | Special Judge Vigilance, Berhampur, Ganjam, Odhissa | 420, 468, 120B | Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) P. C. Act | No | Yes | On appeal on the High Court of Odhissa stayed the case vide. proceedings 4167/2001 order dated 29.11.2011 | ||
13 | C. C. 1/2019 (Private Complaint) | C. C. 1/2019 | JFCM, Parvathipuram | Section 138 N. I. Act | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.