Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Business
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 75,37,680 ~ 75 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 1,03,85,630 ~ 1 Crore+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 51,33,970 ~ 51 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 69,78,240 ~ 69 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 44,89,630 ~ 44 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 25,62,010 ~ 25 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 41,53,270 ~ 41 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 23,10,290 ~ 23 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 27,28,140 ~ 27 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 18,94,260 ~ 18 Lacs+ |
huf | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 4,06,400 ~ 4 Lacs+ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | Y | None | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 3,34,208 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 2,77,203 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 3,73,122 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 1,70,218 ~ 1 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 1,22,250 ~ 1 Lacs+ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 345/2018, Khed Police Station | 143, 147, 149, 323, 504, 506, 188 | Section 37 & 135 of Mumbai Police Act | No | No | |||||
2 | 129/2018, Ratnagiri Gramin Police Station | Summary Criminal Case No.1362/2018 | Judicial Magistrate Ratnagiri | 342, 143, 149 | Sec.37(1)(3), 135 of Mumbai Police Act | No | No | |||
3 | 09/2016, Sawantwadi Police Station | S.C.C. No. 168/2016 | Sawantwadi Court | 143, 147, 188 | Sec- 37(1)(3) and 135 Maharashtra Police Act- 1951, | Yes | 20 Feb 2019 | No | ||
4 | 86/2016, Chiplun Police Station | Regular Case No. 73/2016 | Jt. Civil Judge J.D., JMFC Chiplun | 363, 365, 368, 452, 201, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 341, 342, 504, 506 | No | No | ||||
5 | 30/2012, Sawarde Police Station | Summary Case No.516/2014 | JT. Civil Judge J.D., JMFC Chiplun | 143, 186, 341 | Section 146, 174(A) Railway Act, 1989 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.