Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Business
| Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
|---|---|---|---|
| self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 61,66,200 ~ 61 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 76,97,220 ~ 76 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 75,61,100 ~ 75 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 65,00,690 ~ 65 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 87,03,080 ~ 87 Lacs+ |
| spouse | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 46,66,190 ~ 46 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 29,04,570 ~ 29 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 30,53,210 ~ 30 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 46,32,060 ~ 46 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 43,52,510 ~ 43 Lacs+ |
| huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
| dependent1 | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 6,01,830 ~ 6 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 16,66,620 ~ 16 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 12,51,720 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 4,89,470 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 8,18,790 ~ 8 Lacs+ |
| dependent2 | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 7,75,310 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 16,01,850 ~ 16 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 12,05,880 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 12,35,300 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 15,00,760 ~ 15 Lacs+ |
| dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
| Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
| 1 | Crime No. 825/2012, F2 Egmore Police Station | C.C No. 3791/2012 | XIV, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore | 294B, 323, 427 | Yes | 10 Aug 2012 | No | |||
| 2 | Private Complaint Under Copy right Act | C.C 7563/2003 | XI Metropolitan Magisrtate Court, Saidapet | Section 63 of The Copy Right Act. | No | No | ||||
| 3 | Crime No. 140/2024 | 143, 286, 290 | Section 177 of MV Act | No | No |
| Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
| 1 | Special Case No. 6/97 | XIII ADDL, Special Judge III, Chennai | 120B, 109, 420, 465, 34 | Section 13(2), 13(1)D, Of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 | 2 Years with Fine | 15 Mar 2001 | Yes | Criminal Appeal No. 325/2001 and the Order of Conviction is set a Side |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.