Self Profession:Member of Parliament
Spouse Profession:Not Applicable
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 1,02,78,680 ~ 1 Crore+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 1,31,04,970 ~ 1 Crore+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 1,29,31,110 ~ 1 Crore+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 1,21,54,470 ~ 1 Crore+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 1,20,37,700 ~ 1 Crore+ |
spouse | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 240/2021 dated on 09-09-2021, Delhi | 228A | Section 23(4) POCSO, Section 74 Juvenile Justice Act | No | No | |||||
2 | 0362/2022 dated 04.11.2022, Yeshwanthapura Police Station, Bengaluru City, Karnataka | 9th Addl. Chief Metropolitian Magistrate Court, Nrupatunga Road, Bangalore City | 34, 120B, 403, 465 | Section 63 Copyright Act, Section 66 IT Act | No | Yes | Investigation was stayed in terms of order dated 16.12.2022 in Writ Petition No. 25123/2022 by Honble High Court of Karnataka. On 28.06.2023 the Honble High Court of Karnataka was pleased to dismiss the above writ petition | |||
3 | Complaint Case No. 311/SS/2023 | Court of Metropolitian Magistrate 9th Court Bandra, Mumbai, Maharashtra | 499, 500 | No | Yes | WP/3011/2023 filed before the Honble Bombay High Court challenging order dated 23.11.2019 rejecting the application for dismissal of Complaint on the ground that two separate offences cannot be tried together is pending | ||||
4 | Complaint Case No 1698/2018 (MP/MLA Case No. 16/2021) | Special Court MP/MLA, Ranchi, Jharkhand | 499, 500 | No | Yes | The order dated 15.09.2018 passed in Cr. Revision No. 281/2018 by which the Magistrate was directed to take a fresh look on the materials available on record, after he had dismissed the complaint, was challenged in Cr. M. P. No. 4241/2018 before the Honble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi and vide order dated 16.02.2024 the WP was dismissed | ||||
5 | Complaint Case No. 559/2016 | Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metropolitan) Guwahati, Assam | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Criminal Revision Petition No. 26/2023 was filed before the Additional District and Sessions Judge by Complainant challenging order dated 18.03.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup in C.R. Case No. 559/2016. The Criminal Revision Petition was allowed vide order dated 22.09.2023. The ACJM, Kamrup, Guwahati was directed to hear both parties afresh and pass fresh order | ||||
6 | Complaint Case No. SCC 2425/2014 | Court of the 3rd Jt Civil Judge, JD, JMFC, Bhiwandi, Maharashtra | 499, 500 | No | Yes | (1) WP ST/14290/2023 filed by the Accused challenging the admissability of documents is pending before Honble high Court of Bombay. (2) WP/799/2022 filed by the Complainant challenging order rejecting application for issuance of witness summons was rejected on 22.06.2022 by Honble High Court of Bombay. (3) WP/376/2019 filed by the Complainant challenging application rejecting to mark the transcript copy as an Exhibit. Rejected vide order dated 20.09.2021 by Honble High Court of Bombay. (4) The summoning order dated 11.07.2014 passed by the Ld. JMFC, Bhiwandi was challenged before the Honble High Court of Bombay vide Criminal Writ Petition No. 4960 of 2014. Honble High Court was pleased to dismiss the petition vide order dated 10.03.2015. Against the order dated 15.12.2014 an SLP Crl. No. 3749/2015 was filed before the Honble Supreme Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn vide ordered dated 01.09.2016 | ||||
7 | Complaint Case No. 18/2019 | Court of Ms. Taniya Bamniyal, ACMM-II, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi | 403, 406, 420, 120B | No | Yes | The summoning order dated 26.06.2014 was challenged before the Honble High Court of Delhi vide Crl. M. C. No. 3333 of 2014. The Honble High Court was pleased to dismiss the petition vide order dated 07.12.2015. Against the order dated 07.12.2015 a SLP Crl. No. 1024 of 2016 was filed before the Honble Supreme Court, which was disposed off vide order dated 12.02.2016, whereby all inferences and conclusions drawn by the High Court, on the various factual aspects in the matter were expunged and liberty was granted to raise all the issues before the trial court. Moreover, trial court proceedings have been stayed 22.02.2021 by the Honble High Court of Delhi on a 482 petition (Crl. M. C. No. 578/2021) filed by the Complainant. These is no charge and no conviction. | ||||
8 | Criminal Case No. 29989/2019 | Court of Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 13, Ahmedabad, Gujarat | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Trial was stayed by the Honble Gujarat High Court in terms of order 10.02.2021 in Special Criminal Application No. 1744/2021 filed by the complainant. | ||||
9 | Criminal Enquiry Case No. 36580/2019 | Court of Metropolitan Magistrate 16, Ahmedabad, Gujarat | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Trial was stayed by the Honble Gujarat High Court in terms of order 24.02.2021 in Special Criminal Application No. 2010/2021 filed by the complainant. | ||||
10 | Criminal Case Complaint (P) 1551/2019 | Special Judicial Magistrate MP/MLA Court, Patna, Bihar | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Trial was stayed by the Honble Patna High Court in terms of order 24.04.2023 in Special Criminal Misc. No. 73323/2019 | ||||
11 | Complaint Case 1993/2019 (MP/MLA Case No. 17/2021) | Special Court MP/MLA Ranchi, Jharkhand | 499, 500 | No | Yes | (1) Cr. M. P. No. 152/2020 u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. against summoning order before Honble Jharkhand High Court. The petition was dismissed vide order dated 5.7.2022. (2) WP Cr. No. 302/2023 was allowed vide order dated 16.08.2023 exempting personal appearance by the Honble High Court at Ranchi. | ||||
12 | Complaint Case CC No. 6200/SS/2021 | Court of 40th Metropolitan Magistrate Girgaon, Mumbai, Maharashtra | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Trial was stayed by the Honble Bombay High Court in terms of order dated 22.11.2021 in Writ Petition No. 4391/2021. | ||||
13 | Complaint Case 229/2021 | Special MP/MLA Court, Chaibasa, Jharkhand | 499, 500 | No | Yes | (1) Cr. M. P. No. 1368/2022 u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. in Jharkhand High Court against summoning order is pending. (2) W. P. Cr. No. 230/2024 was filed challenging order dated 27.02.2024 passed by learned Magistrate, Chaibasa issuing NBW. Honble High Court vide order dated 20.03.2024 stayed NBW for one month. | ||||
14 | Complaint Case No. 628/2018 | ACJM (Custom), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, The Honble Court was pleased to dismiss the aforementioned private complaint vide order dated 26.09.2019 | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Criminal Revision 283/2022 was filed by the complainant and same is pending before Honble ADJ, Court No. 14, Lucknow. | ||||
15 | Criminal Misc. Case No. 126818/2022 | ACJM Court No. 27, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, The Honble Court was pleased to dismiss the aforementioned private complaint vide order dated 14.06.2023 | 499, 500 | No | Yes | Criminal Revision 547/2023 was filed by the complainant and same is pending before Honble Special Court, MP/MLA Court No. 19, Lucknow | ||||
16 | Criminal Misc. Case No. 1943/2018 | Special Court MP/MLA, Sultanpur Uttar Pradesh | 499, 500 | No | No | |||||
17 | Complaint Case 7399/2024 | Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru Karnataka | 499, 500 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Complaint Case No. 18712/2019 | Chief Judicial Magistrate Surat | 499, 500 | 2 Years | 23 Mar 2023 | Yes | Criminal Appeal No. 254/2023 was filed on 03.04.2023 beore Principal District and Sessions Judge Surat and the same is pending. The conviction has been stayed vide order dated 04.08.2023 by Honble Supreme court in SLP No. 8644/2023 |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.