Self Profession:Agriculture
Spouse Profession:Agriculture
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 13,84,550 ~ 13 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 12,30,020 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 13,31,820 ~ 13 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 11,63,120 ~ 11 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 11,71,250 ~ 11 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 40,62,140 ~ 40 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 38,27,070 ~ 38 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 38,01,550 ~ 38 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 37,97,560 ~ 37 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 38,10,461 ~ 38 Lacs+ |
huf | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 8,23,530 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 7,33,580 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 6,74,590 ~ 6 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 6,37,850 ~ 6 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 6,79,945 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Diary No 50436/2023 MA-206/2024 | Honorable Supreme Court (Nana Patole Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) | Article 136 Of The Constitution Of India Section 80, 81 Read With Section 100 Of The Representation Of The People Act, (Allowed vide order dated 16.02.2024) | No | No | |||||
2 | Diary No 5691/2023 | Honorable Supreme Court, (Nana Patole Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) | Article 136 Of The Constitution Of India, Section 80, 81 Read With Section 100 Of The Representation Of The People Act | No | No | Restored Through Miscellaneous Application 206/2024, 16.02.2024 | ||||
3 | SLP(C) No 012480/2021, Diary No. 17790/2021 | Honourable Supreme Court (Md. Nafis Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) | Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Section 80, 81 read with Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act | No | No | |||||
4 | Criminal Revision Application No. 729/2021 (Satish Uke Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) | Honorable District Judge Nagpur (Special Court For Differently Able Person, Sr. Citizens And Marginalized Section Of Society, Nagpur) | 176, 200, 417, 420 | Section 125-A, Of The Representation Of The People Act, 1951, Revision U/s 397 of Criminal Procedure Code (arose out of dismissal of Cr.M.A. No. 1145/2021 filed U/s 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code for alleged offences | No | No | Cri. Revision Pending | |||
5 | Criminal Revision Application No. 93/2019 (Bhagwandas Shankarlal Rathi Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari and others) | Honourable District Judge Nagpur (Special Court For Differently able Person, Sr. Citizens and marginalized section of society, Nagpur) | 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 | Revision application U/s 397 Criminal Procedure Code, (Arose out of M.Cr.App No.2744/2018) | No | No | That the Complaint Filed by the complainant was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur against which he has filed the present Criminal Revision Application | |||
6 | Election Petition 10/2019 (Nana Patole Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) | Honourable High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench, Nagpur | Section 80, 81 read with Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act 1951 | No | Yes | SLP Diary No 5691/23 filed before the Honourable Supreme Court, challenging the Order allowing and application under order 6 Rule 16 of the Code of Civil Proceudre | ||||
7 | Election Petition 12/2019 (Md. Nafis Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) | Honourable High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench, Nagpur | Section 80, 81 read with Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act 1951 | No | Yes | SLP (Civil) No 12480/21 filed before the Honourable Supreme Court, challenging the Order allowing and application under order 6 Rule 16 of the Code of Civil Proceudre | ||||
8 | Criminal Revision Application No 83/2017, (Uma Jangam Vs Nitin Jairam Gadkari) (Dismissed vide order dated 17.03.2020 by the Additional Sessions Judge-9, Nagpur) | District Judge-9 and Add. Session Judge Nagpur | 500 | Revision U/s 397 of Criminal Procedure Code (arising out of SCC No. 308/1997 filed) | No | No | Cr. Revision Application Dismissed vide order dated 17.03.2020 | |||
9 | 147/2014, Police Station Suryawa, Dist. Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh | 42/2015 | Honourable Special Judge (MP/MLA) Allahabad | 186, 188, 171H | Criminal Application under Section 482 No. 10682/19 (FIR and chargesheet quashed by the Honourable Allahabad High Court vide order dated 07.12.2019) | No | Yes | FIR and chargesheet quashed by the Honourable Allahabad High Court | ||
10 | Summary Criminal Case No. 308/1997 (Nitin Jairam Gadkari Vs Uma Jangam) | Honourable 7th Jt. CJJD & JMFC Nagpur | 500 | Yes | 09 Dec 2016 | Yes | Criminal Revision Application No 83/2017 dismissed vide order dated 17.03.2020 |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.