Self Profession:MLA Pension, Parliament Pension, Rent, Interest and Agriculture Income and HUF Rent, Interest and Agriculture Income
Spouse Profession:House Property and Bank Interest, Agriculutre
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 22,33,550 ~ 22 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 20,11,710 ~ 20 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 18,78,440 ~ 18 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 28,50,700 ~ 28 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 39,49,240 ~ 39 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 98,09,200 ~ 98 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 70,98,170 ~ 70 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 43,88,330 ~ 43 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 31,17,660 ~ 31 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 5,72,180 ~ 5 Lacs+ |
huf | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 36,27,800 ~ 36 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 33,08,810 ~ 33 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 33,06,561 ~ 33 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 32,96,491 ~ 32 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 30,20,135 ~ 30 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 13,59,117 ~ 13 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 19,00,230 ~ 19 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 21,88,064 ~ 21 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 16,74,120 ~ 16 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 10,55,558 ~ 10 Lacs+ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 176/18, Police Station Shyamala Hills Bhopal Madhya Pradesh | 21st Additional Session Judge and Special Judge MP and MLA Bhopal Madhya Pradesh | 465, 468, 469, 471, 472, 474, 120B | No | No | |||||
2 | Cr.R.P. No. 99/2018 | Metropolitan Session Judge, Nampalli Hyderabad | 500, 501 | The case is a revision petition of section 397 and 399 of the Criminal Procedure Code. | No | No | ||||
3 | CC 91/2017 | VIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampalli, Hyderabad | 500, 501 | No | Yes | Appeal pending in High Court | ||||
4 | 153/15, Police Station Jahangirabad Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh | SCPPS41/2018 | 21st Additional Session Judge and Special Judge MP and MLA Bhopal Madhya Pradesh | 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B | Section 13(1)D r/w 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 | No | No | |||
5 | C-12665/12, Trial No. 05/18 | Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali Bihar | 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 34 | Yes | 15 Apr 2019 | Yes | Miscellaneous criminal petition number 76161/2019 under 482 Criminal Procedure Code for cancellation of complaint before the Honorable Patna High Court. | |||
6 | CRM-5799 of 2014 | Punjab and Haryana High Court | 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which petitions the decision passed by the Honorable Sessions Judge Sirsa in revision petition number 147/2012 dated 30.01.2013. has been presented by Omprakash Bansal against | No | No | |||||
7 | Criminal Appeal No.3477/2022 | High Court Jabalpur | 323, 34, 324, 326 | Petition No. SCPPS10/2018 Filed against the order passed by 22nd Additional Session Judge and Special Judge MP and MLA Bhopal Indore dated 26-03-2022 | No | No | ||||
8 | SCPPM 13/2022 | Special Judicial Magistrate MP and MLA Cases Bhopal | 500 | Yes | 26 Apr 2023 | No | ||||
9 | 467/2020, Police Station MP Nagar Bhopal | SCPPM 7/2022 | Special Judicial Magistrate MP and MLA Cases Bhopal | 188 | No | No | ||||
10 | 311/2023, Police Station Tukoganj Indore | 153A, 469, 500, 505 | No | No | ||||||
11 | 551/2023, Police Station Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh | 153A, 469, 500, 505 | No | No | ||||||
12 | 580/2023, Police Station Guna, Madhya Pradesh | 153A, 469, 500, 505 | No | No | ||||||
13 | 4/2023, Police Station Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh | 505 | Section 3(1)(U) SC/ST Act | No | No | |||||
14 | 714/2023, Police Station Dewas, Madhya Pradesh | 153A, 469, 500, 505 | No | No | ||||||
15 | 298/2017, Police Station Jubilee Hills Hyderabad, Telangana | 505(1)(A), 505(2) | No | No | ||||||
16 | Crime number 134/2022 as per information received from newspapers | 500, 501, 34 | Not present any information from Court | No | No | |||||
17 | CC 134/2022 | Special Judge JMFC for Excise Cases | 500, 501, 34 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.