Self Profession:Public Life
Spouse Profession:Retired
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 1,58,34,637 ~ 1 Crore+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 1,55,25,477 ~ 1 Crore+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 1,66,65,380 ~ 1 Crore+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 1,67,57,660 ~ 1 Crore+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 1,47,35,080 ~ 1 Crore+ |
spouse | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 01/14 ECIR No.31/DZ/2010 Enforcement Department New Delhi | CC 1/2014 | Special Court Judge Mr O P Saini 2G Cases Patiala House New Delhi | Sec. 3, r/w 4 Prevention of Unlawful Money Transfer Act | Yes | 31 Oct 2014 | Yes | The candidate was acquitted on 21 12 2017. Enforcement Department has proceeded with the Honble Delhi High Court for leave to appeal C R L No. 184/2018 against the Special Courts judgment dated 21 12 2017. Till date the Mandamiku High Court has not granted leave to this petition. | ||
2 | RC DAI.A 0045 Date 21.10.2009 Investigation Department Police Station CBICG Complex New Delhi | CC 1/2011 | Special Court Judge Mr O P Saini 2G Cases Patiala House New Delhi | 120B, 420, 409, 468, 471, 193 | Sec. 7 or 11,12,13(2) 13(1)(d) r/w Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 | Yes | 22 Oct 2011 | Yes | Candidate acquitted on 21.12. 2017 Manbumi filed leave to appeal in Delhi High Court against Special Courts judgment dated 21.12.2017 Investigation continued LB No. 18552018 Honble Delhi High Court vide its order dated 22 3 2024 allowed this writ petition. |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.