Self Profession:Business, Consulting, Social and Political work
Spouse Profession:Govt. Service (Income Tax Department)
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 1,00,07,030 ~ 1 Crore+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 1,40,08,180 ~ 1 Crore+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 14,01,120 ~ 14 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 48,01,170 ~ 48 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 62,93,863 ~ 62 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2022 - 2023 | 2022 - 2023 ** Rs 40,61,130 ~ 40 Lacs+ 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 31,26,530 ~ 31 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 34,02,170 ~ 34 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 28,43,870 ~ 28 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 26,19,381 ~ 26 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 12/24, Dated 22/02/2024, PS Parliament Street, New Delhi | 12/2024 | 188 | Matter is Still Pending Investigation at the PS Parliament Street New Delhi | No | No | ||||
2 | 158/2021, PS Kotwali Sadar Unnao of Dec 2021 | Ms. Tanya Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao UP | 153 | Section 61(D) IT Act. | No | No | ||||
3 | 150/21, Dated 12/08/2021 PS Parliament Street, New Delhi | Cr. Case No. 9822/2021 | 188, 269, 283 | Section 3 Epidemic Diseases Act R/W 51(b) Disaster Management Act. The Case was pending in the Court of Ms. Anamika, MM, PHC, New Delhi but vide order dated 28/02/2024 the case was transferred for the MP/MLA Court Rouse Avenue, New Delhi and Vide order dated 05/03/2024 Ld. Principal District Judge, PHC, New Delhi Sent the same to Delhi High Court for the assignment to the MP/MLA Court but till date no court has been assigned for the adjudication of the case | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.