PANVEL Constituency Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates

1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:PANVEL

Generated Sunday 17th of November 2024 06:47:52 PM

Name	Age	Party Code	Criminal Cases	Education Level	Immovable Assets	Total Liabilities	PAN Given (Y/N)
Balaram Dattatrey Patil	60	Peasants And Workers Party of India	Yes 8	Graduate	19,91,78,849 ~ 19 Crore+	85,95,650 ~ 85 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 1 IPC Details* Punishment for criminal intimidation(506), Unlawful assembly(141), Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly(143), Punishment for Rioting(147), Rioting, armed with deadly weapon(148), Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object(149), Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant(188), Threat of injury to public servant(189), Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due(208), Act endangering life or personal safety of others(336), Punishment for wrongful restraint(341), Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees(427), Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace(504),
Leena Arjun Garad	46	Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)	No	Graduate	39,48,59,858 ~ 39 Crore+	1,20,02,190 ~ 1 Crore+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Prashant Ramsheth Thakur	50	BJP	Yes 10	12th Pass	4,17,03,67,842 ~ 417 Crore+	42,55,440 ~ 42 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly(143), Joining or continuing in unlawful assembly, knowing it has been commanded to disperse(145), Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant(188), Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life(269), Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life(270), Punishment for wrongful restraint(341),

*451 House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment , 452 House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint , 506 Punishment for criminal intimidation , 2 Punishment of offences committed within India , 3 Punishment of offences committed beyond, but which by law may be tried within, India , 19 Judge , 109 Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment , 117 Abetting commission of offence by the public or by more than ten persons , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 135 Abetment of desertion of soldier, sailor or airman , 141 Unlawful assembly , 143 Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly , 145 Joining or continuing in unlawful assembly, knowing it has been commanded to disperse , 147 Punishment for Rioting , 148 Rioting, armed with deadly weapon , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 188 Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant , 189 Threat of injury to public servant , 208 Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due , 269 Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life , 270 Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life , 323 Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt , 336 Act endangering life or personal safety of others , 341 Punishment for wrongful restraint , 342 Punishment for wrongful Confinement , 385 Putting person in fear of injury in order to commit extortion , 426 Punishment for mischief , 427 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees , 501 Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory , 504 Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from PANVEL constituency (RAIGAD).

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs