Self Profession:Politician
Spouse Profession:Spouse 1- Govt. Employee, Spouse 2- Govt. Employee, Spouse 3- Social Worker
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
spouse | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent1 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent2 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | S. T. (VIG) Case No. 02 of 2009 (05 of 2013) | The Special Judge(PC Act) East Sikkim at Gangtok | 403, 120B, 403, 406 | Section 13(2) R/W Section 13(1)(D)(II) of the PC Act 1988 | Under Section 13(2) R/W Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of PC Act 1988 was sentenced S. I. for 1 Year and To Pay a Fine of Rs. 10000/- and Under Section 403 IPC was Sentenced S. I. for 1 Year and Under Section 120B(2) R/W Sections 403/406 of IPC, 1860 was Sentenced S. I. for 6 Months. The aforestated sentences ran concurrently | 28 Dec 2016 | Yes | An Appeal was preferred in the High Court of Sikkim Gangtok and Same was registered as Crl. A. No. 1 of 2017. However the conviction and sentence of the Ld. trial Court was affirmed and upheld vide Judgement Dated 28.06.2017, Against the impugned final Judgement and Order Dated 28.06.2017 in Crl. A. No. 01 of 2017 Passed by the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok a Special Leave Petition was filed before the Supreme Court of India same being Special Leave petition (Criminal) Dairy No. (S) 32346/2017/. However the Special Leave Petition too was dismissed vide Order Dated 10.11.2017 as it found no legal and valid ground for interference |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.