Self Profession:Business Man & Social Worker
Spouse Profession:House wife
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Tamil Nadu 2016 | Rs2,91,04,029 ~2 Crore+ | 10 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 10,09,570 ~ 10 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 8,10,212 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 3,45,560 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 3,15,600 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 2,75,600 ~ 2 Lacs+ |
spouse | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 995/2020, Kottar Police Station, Nagarkoil, Kanyakumari Dist | Judicial Magistrate Court II Nagarkoil, Kanyakumari Dist. | 143, 269 | Section 3 Epidemic Disease Act 1897 | No | No | ||||
2 | 645/2020, Nungambakkam Police Station, Chennai | 14th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai | 143, 188, 269 | Section 41(6) MCP Act | No | No | ||||
3 | 674/2020, Thiruvallam Police Station, Trivandrum, Kerala State | Judicial Magistrate Court II, Neyyatingara, Kerala State | 406, 420 | No | No | |||||
4 | 1214/2020, Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Chennai | Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai | 509, 506(2) | Section 4 Women Harassment Act | No | No | ||||
5 | 227/2008, R3 Police Station, Ashok Nagar, Chennai. | C.C. No. 14808/2009 | XVII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet | 365, 323, 506(ii) | No | No | ||||
6 | 161/2018, Thalaiyuthu Police Station, Tirunelveli, Dt. | Judicial Magistrate Court 3 Tirunelveli District. | 294b, 506(ii), 353 | Section 4 Tamil Nadu Prevention of Public Property Damage Act 1994 | No | No | ||||
7 | 85/2019, Pudukottai Police Station, Tuticorin Dt. | Judicial Magistrate Court 3 Tuticorin District. | Section 25(1B)(b), 30, 35 Arms Act | No | No | |||||
8 | 175/2019, Courtralam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. | STC 792/2019 | Judicial Magistrate Court, Shenkottai, Tirunelveli Dist. | 143, 171c | No | No | ||||
9 | 264/2018, Mambalam Police Station. Chennai | Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet | 143, 188 | No | No | |||||
10 | 276/ 2016, Thisayanvilai Police Station, Tirunelveli Dt. | Judicial Magistrate Court Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District. | 147, 148, 448, 506(ii) | Section 3 Tamilnadu Public Property Damage and Loss Act 1992 | No | No | ||||
11 | 275/2019, Soundara Pandiyanar Agadi Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai | Judicial Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai | 143, 41 | No | No | |||||
12 | 317/2018, R1- Mambalam Police Station, Chennai | Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Teynampet Chennai | 403, 406, 420, 465, 471, 34, 120b | No | No | |||||
13 | 30/2018, Devarkulum Police Station, Tirunelveli- Dt | Judicial Magistrate Court, No. V Tirunelveli- Dt. | Section 4A (la)- TNOPPD Act | No | No | |||||
14 | 274/2019, Surya Nagar Police Station, Anekal Sub Division, Bangalore, Karnataka state | 2nd Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) & JMFC Court, Anekal, Bangalore | 34, 406, 420 | No | No | |||||
15 | 02/2020, KP Agrahara Police Station, Bangalore, Karnataka state | IV A.C.M.M Bangalore City, Karnataka | 406, 420 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.