Self Profession:Business & Social Work
Spouse Profession:Business & Social Work
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Uttar Pradesh 2017 | Rs1,14,29,81,841 ~114 Crore+ | 4 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2020 - 2021 | 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 52,22,570 ~ 52 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 97,57,883 ~ 97 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 1,25,58,260 ~ 1 Crore+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 1,65,99,990 ~ 1 Crore+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 1,75,56,010 ~ 1 Crore+ |
spouse | Y | 2020 - 2021 | 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 12,88,130 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 22,13,090 ~ 22 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 76,53,727 ~ 76 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 37,83,300 ~ 37 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 30,51,198 ~ 30 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | GR 911/11, Chanditala (Hooghly) PS, WB | 186/11, Dated24/08/2011 | ACJM, Srirampur (Hooghly), WB | 405, 406, 409 | Yes | 07 May 2013 | Yes | On 21/02/2012 his Lordship Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta and Sri Jaymalya Bagchi of Kolkata High Court accepted CRM No. 12425 of 2011 u/s438 IPC and directed that in case of arrest the accused persons shall be granted bail with a Bail Bond of Rs. 10,000/- Subsequently Bail was granted by ACJM Srirampur. The case is sub-judice. | ||
2 | 102 Complaint Case Chanditala (Hooghly) PS, WB | 102, Dated- 22-09-2009 | ACJM, Srirampur, Dist. Hooghly | 469, 471, 419, 195, 205, 120B, 500, 504, 506 | Section 142/143 Railway Act 89 | No | Yes | On 20-12-2011 CRR petition no. 3888/11 U/S 482 of the CRPC was heard in the Honble High court Kolkata before his Lordship Sri Raghunath Bhattacharya which was accepted and order was passed to stop all proceedings of the case for 10 weeks. Again on 24-02-2012 CRR 379/12 was filed also pleased to pass order for stopping all proceedings for another 12 weeks. Thereafter on 23-07-2012 (CRAN 2556/12) his Lordship Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahuluwalia was pleased to pass an order that the interim order already granted in favour of petitioner shall continue until further orders. | ||
3 | Bidhan Nagar South (North 24 Parganas) Ps | 49/11, Dated- 07-03-2011 | ACJM, Bidhan Nagar, North 24 Pargana | 469, 471, 419, 195, 205, 120B, 500, 506, 504 | No | No | The case was investigated by SI Sri Prabhakar Adhikari of Bidhan Nagar South PS and subsequently Final Report (Mistake of Fact) vide on 126 dated 08-09-2015 was duly submitted in the court of ACJM, Bidhan Nagar (North 24 Parganas). Complainant filed non-agree petition and further investigation had been ordered 08-10-2015. No report has been filed thereafter. | |||
4 | Surir PS | Complaint Case No. 220A/07, Dated- 18-05-2007 | ACJM I, Mathura | 147, 143, 506, 504 | No | No | The complaint being dissatisfied appealed again and reinvestigation ordered. Over this an applocation was filed in Allahabad High Court vide Appeal No. 1162/2008 and his Lordship was pleased to pass an order in August 2013 to stop all proceeding of the case. |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.