Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Business
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2019 - 2020 | Rs 17,90,320 ~ 17 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2019 - 2020 | Rs 11,92,480 ~ 11 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | Y | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent4 | Y | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 147, 148, 307, 332, 353, 120B, 149 | Section 3 & 4 PDP Act and Section 7(1)(d) Criminal Amendment Act, FIR No. 12/2011, Naupada Police Station, Santhabommali Manal Srikakulam Dist., SC No. 124/2018, Court- Assistant Secession Judge Court, Tekkali | |
2 | 147, 148, 307, 435, 436, 332, 353, 120B, 149 | Section 3 PDP Act, FIR NO. 16/2011, Naupada Police Station, Santhabommali Manal Srikakulam Dist., S.C.No. 24/2020, Court- Assistant Secession Judge Court, Tekkali | |
3 | 147, 148, 188, 307, 332, 353, 120B, 149 | Section 3 PDP Act, Section 174 Crpc., FIR No. 17/2011, Naupada Police Station, Santhabommali Manal Srikakulam Dist., P.R.C. No. 11/2017, Court- Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kotabommali | |
4 | 147, 148, 120B, 307, 353, 341, 506, 149 | FIR No. 4/2011, Santhabommali Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist., SC No. 82/2019, Court- Principal Assistant Session Judge, Srikakulam | |
5 | 341, 353, 34 | FIR No. 51/2011, Santhabommali Police Station, Santhabommali Mandal Srikakulam Dist., Court- JFCM Court, Kotabommali | |
6 | 420, 323, 384, 379, 506, 34 | Section 156(3) Crpc., FIR No. 51/2015 Tekkai Police Station, Tekkali Mandal Srikakulam Dist., C.C. No. 222/2015, JFCM Court, Tekkali | |
7 | 294B, 506, 34 | FIR No. 34/2020, Tekkai Police Station, Tekkali Mandal Srikakulam Dist., Court- JFCM Court, Tekkali | |
8 | 468, 471 | Section 12 Odisha minerals prevention of theft smuggling and un-lawful actives act 1989, GR No. 28/2007, Parlakhimundi Police Station, Gajapathi Dist., Odisha State, CC No. 12, Court- Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate Court, Parlakhimundi, Gajapathi Dist., Odisha State | |
9 | Section 22 M.M (D&R) Act 1957 and rule 68-1(ii) OMMC Rule 2004, CC- 9/10, Court- Sub-divisional Magistrate Parlakhimundi, Gajapathi Dist., Odisha 2(c), Appeal- High Court of Odhissa stayed the proceedings vide. 4167/2001 order dated- 29/11/2011 | ||
10 | 420, 468, 120B | Section 13(2) R/w 13(1) P.C Act, G.R. No. 37/12, Vigilance, Berhampur, Court- Special Judge Vigilance, Berhampur, Ganjam, Odhissa, Appeal- High Court of Odhissa stayed the proceedings vide, 4167/2001 order dated- 29/11/2011 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.