Myneta.info is an open data repository platform of Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR).
Myneta Logo Myneta Logo
Home Lok Sabha State Assemblies Rajya Sabha Political Parties Electoral Bonds || माय नेता हिंदी में || About MyNeta About ADR ☰
State Assemblies Rajya Sabha Political Parties
1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:HUMNABAD

Generated Friday 22nd of November 2024 06:32:38 AM
Name Age Party Code Criminal Cases Education Level Movable Assets Immovable Assets Total Assets Total Liabilities PAN Given
(Y/N)
Anjum Begum 40 All India Mahila Empowerment Party No

Graduate 2,50,000
~ 2 Lacs+		 0
~ 		N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Ankush 48 Bharatiya Republican Paksha Yes

8 		12th Pass 55,00,000
~ 55 Lacs+		 13,60,000
~ 13 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 1
IPC Details*
Punishment for criminal intimidation(506),
Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly(143),
Punishment for Rioting(147),
Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object(149),
Punishment for wrongful restraint(341),
Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty(353),
Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees(427),
Punishment for criminal trespass(447),
Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace(504),
Eknath 63 IND No

Illiterate 8,20,000
~ 8 Lacs+		 1,13,000
~ 1 Lacs+		 N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
M Naseemuddin Patel 56 JD(S) Yes

1 		10th Pass 65,50,000
~ 65 Lacs+		 28,41,728
~ 28 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 5
IPC Details*
Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420),
Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.(467),
Forgery for purpose of cheating(468),
Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery punishable otherwise(473),
Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine(474),
Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B),
Punishment for cheating(417),
Dishonest or fraudulent execution of deed of transfer containing false statement of consideration(423),
Punishment for forgery(465),
Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Prashant 31 Dr. Ambedkar Peoples Party No

Post Graduate 4,00,000
~ 4 Lacs+		 0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Rajshekhar 54 INC No

12th Pass 11,16,00,000
~ 11 Crore+		 87,08,315
~ 87 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Subhash 68 BJP No

Post Graduate 2,11,00,000
~ 2 Crore+		 5,06,120
~ 5 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*

*420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 467 Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating , 473 Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery punishable otherwise , 474 Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine , 506 Punishment for criminal intimidation , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 143 Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly , 147 Punishment for Rioting , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 341 Punishment for wrongful restraint , 353 Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty , 417 Punishment for cheating , 423 Dishonest or fraudulent execution of deed of transfer containing false statement of consideration , 427 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees , 447 Punishment for criminal trespass , 465 Punishment for forgery , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record , 504 Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from HUMNABAD constituency (BIDAR).

Share On:
Download App Follow us on

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs