Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Business
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2021 - 2022 | 2021 - 2022 ** Rs 37,05,776 ~ 37 Lacs+ 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 12,25,211 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 18,50,000 ~ 18 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 15,50,000 ~ 15 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 20,59,630 ~ 20 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2020 - 2021 | 2020 - 2021 ** Rs 6,08,990 ~ 6 Lacs+ 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 11,50,000 ~ 11 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 9,50,000 ~ 9 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 18,59,930 ~ 18 Lacs+ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Crime No. 51/2019 | Spl.C. No. 414/2019 | II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural Dist. | 447, 504, 506, 182 | Section (1)(R), 3(1)(G) & 3(1)(S) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 | Yes | 31 Aug 2021 | Yes | Criminal Petition No.2298/2023 filed against the Proceeding Spl. C.No. 414/2019 before the Honble High Court of Karnataka Which is Pending Consideration | |
2 | Crime No. 176/2018 | CC No. 1328/2019 | I Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural Dist. | 506, 341, 324, 34 | Yes | 20 Sep 2021 | No | |||
3 | Crime No. 324/2019 | CC No. 8370/2020 | I Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural Dist. | 143, 147, 148, 447, 427, 323, 504, 506, 324, 149 | No | No | ||||
4 | Crime No. 20/2023 | Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Mayohall Court, Bengaluru City | 406, 417, 420, 465, 468, 120B, 34 | No | No | |||||
5 | CC No. 56259/2017 | XXXIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Mayohall Court, Bengaluru City | Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act | No | No | |||||
6 | CC No. 56260/2017 | XXXIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Mayohall Court, Bengaluru City | Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act | No | No | |||||
7 | CC No. 56261/2017 | XXXIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate At Mayohall Court, Bengaluru City | Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act | No | No | |||||
8 | CC No. 14/2023 | Honble Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn) & CJM Court, Sidlaghtta, Chikkaballapur Dist. | 143, 188, 269, 149 | Section 4(2)(a) of The Karnataka Epidemic Diseases Act. | No | No | ||||
9 | Crime No. 114/2022 | Honble Additional District and Session Court Chikkaballapur District at Chikkaballapur | 323, 354, 504, 506, 120B, 34 | Section 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S) of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act. 2015 | No | No | ||||
10 | Crime No. 35/2023 | Honble Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.) & CJM Court, Sidlaghatta, Chikkaballapur Dist. | Section 127A of The Representation of People Act 1950 | No | No | |||||
11 | Crime No. 37/2023 | Honble Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn) & CJM Court,Sidlaghatta, Chikkaballapur Dist. | Section 171(E) of the Representation of People Act 1950 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | CC No. 18780/2016 | VI Addl. Judge, Court of Samll Causes and ACMM at Bengaluru | Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. | Imposing fine 8455000/- and in default payment of fine, the accused shall under go simple imprisonment for three months and Rs. 5000/- shall be remitted to the State | 08 Apr 2022 | Yes | Criminal Appeal No. 551/2022 pending on the File of the LXIX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, on 11.05.2022 the Honble Court was pleased to granted an interim order the operation and execution of order of sentence passed by the Honble Court in CC No. 18780/2016 The Case is at Arguments Stage Complainant has also filed Criminal Appeal No. 1116/22 before the Honble High Court of Karnataka seeking for enhance of sentence from Rs. 8455000/- to Rs. 16910000/- The Criminal Appeal is at Admission Stage |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.