Self Profession:Politics
Spouse Profession:Business
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Jharkhand 2019 | Rs1,39,93,061 ~1 Crore+ | 14 |
Jharkhand Election 2014 | Rs92,46,325 ~92 Lacs+ | 5 |
Loksabha 2014 | Rs1,01,28,031 ~1 Crore+ | 7 |
Jharkhand 2009 | Rs43,32,149 ~43 Lacs+ | 4 |
Lok Sabha 2009 | Rs48,32,110 ~48 Lacs+ | 2 |
Lok Sabha 2004 | Rs20,73,126 ~20 Lacs+ | 2 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 8,60,160 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 8,26,090 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 7,15,130 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 4,37,490 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 6,38,020 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 4,43,190 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 4,74,710 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 5,24,450 ~ 5 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 4,98,650 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 6,64,450 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
huf | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent1 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent2 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
dependent3 | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 77/2019 Dt. 02-04-019 P.S Godda Town | 77/19 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 171G, 123(3), 125 | No | No | ||||
2 | 57/17, Dt. 21-04-2017 P.S Poraiyahat Godda | 503/17 | Principal Dist. & Session Judge | 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506, 120B | No | Yes | Yes Honble High Court Jharkhand has Stayed Proceedings | |||
3 | 56/17, Dt. 20-04-2017 P.S Poraiyahat Godda | 500/17 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 147, 148, 149, 353, 120B, 427, 504, | Section 3 of Prevention of Public Property Act. | No | Yes | Yes, Stay Proceeding Next Hearing on 15.05.2019 | ||
4 | 54/17, Dt. 20-04-2017 P.S Poraiyahat Godda | 496/17 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 147, 148, 149, 353, 120B, | No | Yes | Yes, Stay Proceeding Next Hearing on 15.05.2019 | |||
5 | 53/17, Dt. 16-04-2017 P.S Poraiyahat Godda | 488/17 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 224, 353, 120B, 117, 34 | No | Yes | Yes, Stay Proceeding Next Hearing on 15.05.2019 | |||
6 | 107/17, Dt. 05-03-2017 P.S Godda | 292/17 | Principal Dist. & Session Judge Godda | 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 109, 120B, | Section 5 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act 1984 | Yes | 21 Dec 2018 | No | ||
7 | 405/16, P.S Jagarnathpur Ranchi | 6657/16 | Sri Anuj Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Ranchi | 147, 149, 188, 154, 353, 427, 151, 323, 152 | No | No | ||||
8 | 71/2014, P.S Sarwan Dist. Deoghar | 460/14 | Smt Anju Kumari 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Deoghar | Section 3 Prevention of damage to Public Property Act. | Yes | 08 Jan 2015 | No | |||
9 | 307/14, Dt. 19-12-2014 P.S Godda Town | 1814/14 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 188, 143, 504, 506 | Section 126 of R.P Act 1951 | Yes | 15 Apr 2019 | No | ||
10 | 26/2012, P.S Godda Mufassil | 95/12 | Sub. Judge 1st Cum ACJM Godda | 144, 341, 283, 353 | No | No | ||||
11 | 363/10, P.S Deoghar Town | 963/10 | CJM Deoghar | 224, 225, 143, 149, 353, 341 | No | No | ||||
12 | 125/2009, Dt. 23-04-2009 P.S Godda | 392/09 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 144, 188, 506, 171G | Yes | 13 Jan 2010 | No | |||
13 | 166/08, Dt. 03-09-2008 P.S Poraiyahat Godda | 1035/08 | Sri Rajesh Ranjan Kumar 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Godda | 143, 290, 291, 283, 186 | Yes | 25 Aug 2009 | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.