Advanced search
Home→Nagaland 2013

Nagaland 2013

Election Summary

HIGHLIGHTS OF CANDIDATES
Total number of constituencies analyzed=60
Total candidates analyzed by NEW = 187
Candidates with declared criminal cases = 3 (2%)
Candidates with declared serious criminal cases = 1 (1%)
Crorepati candidates = 84 (45%)
Candidates who are graduate or above = 135 (72%)
Candidates who have not declared PAN = 85 (45%)
Total women candidates = 2 (1%)
Total candidates who have filed ITR = 3 (2%)
HIGHLIGHTS OF WINNERS
 
Total winners analyzed by NEW = 60
Winners with declared criminal cases = 1 (2%)
Winners with declared serious criminal cases = 0 (0%)
Crorepati winners = 36 (60%)
Winners who are graduate or above = 43 (72%)
Winners who have not declared PAN = 24 (40%)
Total women winners = 0 (0%)
Total winners who have filed ITR = 1 (2%)

List of constituencies (District Wise)

DIMAPUR
1: DIMAPUR-I

2: DIMAPUR-II

3: DIMAPUR-III

4: GHASPANI-I

5: GHASPANI-II

 
KIPHIRE
1: PUNGRO KIPHIRE

2: SEYOCHUNG SITIMI

 
KOHIMA
1: KOHIMA TOWN

2(a) : NORTHERN ANGAMI-I

2(b): NORTHERN ANGAMI-I : BYE ELECTION ON 29-07-2017
3(a) : NORTHERN ANGAMI-II

3(b): NORTHERN ANGAMI-II : BYE ELECTION ON 15-10-2014
4: SOUTHERN ANGAMI-I

5: SOUTHERN ANGAMI-II

6: TSEMINYU

7: WESTERN ANGAMI

 
LONGLENG
1: LONGLENG

2: TAMLU

 
MOKOKCHUNG
1: ALONGTAKI

2: ANGETYONGPANG

3: AONGLENDEN

4: ARKAKONG

5: IMPUR

6: JANGPETKONG

7: KORIDANG

8: MOKOKCHUNG TOWN

9: MONGOYA

10: TULI

 
MON
1: ABOI

2: MOKA

3: MON TOWN

4: PHOMCHING

5: TAPI

6: TEHOK

7: TIZIT

8: TOBU

9: WAKCHING

 
PEREN
1: PEREN

2: TENNING

 
PHEK
1: CHAZOUBA

2: CHIZAMI

3: MELURI

4: PFUTSERO

5: PHEK

 
PUGHOBOTO
1: PUGHOBOTO

 
TUENSANG
1: LONGKHIM CHARE

2: NOKLAK

3(a) : NOKSEN

3(b): NOKSEN : BYE- ELECTION ON 4-09-2013
4: SHAMATOR CHESSORE

5: THONOKNYU

6: TUENSANG SADAR-I

7: TUENSANG SADAR-II

 
WOKHA
1: BHANDARI

2: SANIS

3: TYUI

4: WOKHA

ZUNHEBOTO
1: AGHUNATO

2: AKULUTO

3: ATOIZU

4: SATAKHA

5: SURUHOTO

6: ZUNHEBOTO

 

Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.