Self Profession:Politician
Spouse Profession:Business and Politician
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Punjab 2022 | Rs68,73,43,757 ~68 Crore+ | 1 |
Punjab 2017 | Rs48,31,71,009 ~48 Crore+ | 4 |
Loksabha 2014 | Rs86,35,64,071 ~86 Crore+ | 3 |
Punjab 2012 | Rs45,74,68,469 ~45 Crore+ | 6 |
Punjab 2007 | Rs38,49,90,247 ~38 Crore+ | 4 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 14,94,830 ~ 14 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 28,66,310 ~ 28 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201, 120B | Section 7, 13, (1)(C)(D) RW Section 13(2), 14 PC Act 1988, Court taking Cognizance- Session Judge cum Special Judge Ludhiana (Shri Karanbir Singh) Sessions Case No. 3/2007, Date of Cognizance- 24.12.2007, Case is pending for 21.01.2017 for arguments on charge, FIR No. 5/07 dated 23.03.2007, Police Station- Vigilance Bureau Ludhiana | |
2 | 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B | Section 7, 13, (1)(D), 13(2) pC Act 1988, Court taking Cognizance- Additional Session Judge cum Special Judge SAS Nagar (Mohali), Sessions Case No. 1/9 of 10.02.2009 RT 43/13 of 02.01.2013, Date of Cognizance- 10.02.2009, Case is pending for arguments on framing of charge, However after further investigation the state has filed the cancellation report Pending for 20.01.2017, FIR No. 3/2008 dated 11.09.2008, Police Station- Vigilance Bureau Mohali | |
3 | 120 | Section 7, 8,9, 13(1)(d)(E), 14 read with Section 13(2) PC Act 1988, FIR No. 28 dated 20.06.2008, Police Station- Vigilance Bureau-2 (Flying squad) Patiala, Challan has not been presented | |
4 | 176, 177, 181, 186, 187, 193, 199 | Section 277 of the Income Tax Act 1961, Criminal Complaint No. 212/A dated 02.12.2016, COMA No. 12412 of 2016, Shri Jaapinder Singh PCS Chief Judicial Magistrate Ludhiana and fixed for 17.01.2017 for consideration of complaint |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.