
Self Profession:Agriculturist
Spouse Profession:Agriculturist
| Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
|---|---|---|---|
| self | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 12,83,386 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 18,72,177 ~ 18 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 28,30,113 ~ 28 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 27,82,603 ~ 27 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 11,24,428 ~ 11 Lacs+ |
| spouse | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 15,61,694 ~ 15 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 18,72,177 ~ 18 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 30,86,816 ~ 30 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 26,30,358 ~ 26 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 6,30,106 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
| huf | ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil ** Nil | ||
| dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
| dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
| dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
| Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
| 1 | 126/2013, Kaij City Police Station, Dist. Beed, Maharashtra | RCC No. 186/2014 | Judicial Magistrate First Class Kaij, Dist. Beed | IPC | Section 3 & 10 of Essential Commodities Act 1955, Section 3(3) of the Sugar Control Order 1966 | No | No | Criminal Writ Petition No. 1113/2017 filed before Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) against Order of rejection of discharge application in RCC No. 186/2024 | |||
| 2 | 139/2013, Beed City Police Station, Dist. Beed, Maharashtra | Special ACB Case No. 05/2018 | District and Session Court, Beed | IPC | 420, 418, 409, 34 | Section 131(1)(C), 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 3 of The Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act 1999 | No | No | |||
| 3 | Criminal MA No. 97/2017 | District and Session Court, Beed | IPC | Section 3 & 4 of Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance 1944 | No | No | |||||
| 4 | 224/19, MRA Marg Police Station, Mumbai Subsequently renumbered as EOW FIR No. 78/19, PS- Economic Offences Wing, Mumbai | Misc Appln ACB 100821/2020 | Mumbai City Civil and Special Court, Mumbai | IPC | 409, 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120B | Section 13(1)(b) and 13(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 | No | No |
| Serial No. | Case No. | Court | LAW / Section Type | IPC/BNS Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
| ---------No Cases-------- | |||||||||
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.