Self Profession:Yadav Bricks Field
Spouse Profession:Agricultural
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2009 - 2010 | Rs 2,59,717 ~ 2 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2008 - 2009 | Rs 1,61,450 ~ 1 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 147, 323, 325, 506 | case no 10/08, cr.no.94/06 A.C.J.M. KUNDA Kishorilal Nawabganj cognizance | |
2 | 323,504,506,452 | case no 443/08, criminal no 85/7 J.M.Court Kunda Pratapgarh Gov.Shankar Yadav cognizancea in Nawabganj | |
3 | 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 | case no 185/08,criminal no 119/07A.C.J.M. KUNDA Pratapgarh Gov vs Shankar yadav cognizancea in Manikpur | |
4 | 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 171(c) | case no 826/07,criminal no 70/07A.C.J.M. KUNDA Pratapgarh Gov vs Rohit Singh cognizancea in Manikpur | |
5 | 147, 148, 452, 323, 504,506 | case no 442/08,criminal no 80/07J.M.Court Kunda Pratapgarh Gov.Shankar Yadav cognizancea in Nawabganj | |
6 | 4/10 Forest conservation act., case no 16/09,criminal no 83/07,.M.Court Kunda Pratapgarh Gov.vs Shankar YADAV cognizancea in Nawabganj | ||
7 | 452, 323, 325, 504, 506 | case no 267/08,criminal no 107/2000J.M.Court Kunda Pratapgarh Ram Shankar vs Ramrup Sahu cognizancea in Nawabganj | |
8 | 323, 504, 506, 427 | 3(1)(X)SC/ST ACT, Case No 4277A/2010,criminal no 82/2001 A.C.J.M.1 Court court no.11 Raebarely Kamlesh Kumar Pasi vs Akshay Pratap Singh cognizancea in Uchhahar |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.