Self Profession:Social Worker
Spouse Profession:Housewife
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Uttar Pradesh 2017 | Rs3,47,34,553 ~3 Crore+ | 13 |
Loksabha 2014 | Rs3,66,87,134 ~3 Crore+ | 17 |
Uttar Pradesh 2007 | Rs23,82,894 ~23 Lacs+ | 12 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2009 - 2010 | Rs 6,24,252 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2009 - 2010 | Rs 52,37,000 ~ 52 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 147,323,504,506 | BAILED OUT CASE NO. 426/ 1999 | |
2 | 147,323,353,332,365,511,352,198,143,368,387,427,342,452 | SC-ST Act, 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act CASE NO. 425/1995, bailed out, matter is pending with CB/CID | |
3 | 307 | CASE NO. 153/2000 | |
4 | 364A,120B, | 2/3 UP Gangster Act CASE NO. 157/01 | |
5 | 307 | CASE NO. 61/01 | |
6 | 2/3 UP Gangster Act, Case No. 429/02, stayed by Hon'ble High Court | ||
7 | 307 | CASE NO. 217/2005 | |
8 | 307,120B, | CASE NO. 216/05 | |
9 | 147,436,504,506,427 | CASE NO. 384/09 | |
10 | 147,148,149,427,452,395,504,506 | CASE NO. 646/2010 | |
11 | 147,148,504,506,449 | CASE NO. 780/2010 | |
12 | 406,323,504,506 | CASE NO. 1077/2010 | |
13 | 307,147,148,504,352 | CASE NO. 162/2011 | |
14 | 380,457,427, | CASE NO. 324/2011 | |
15 | 307,147,148,149,504,506,452 | CASE NO. 287/2011 | |
16 | 147,148,149,166,167,379,427,452,120B | CASE NO. 370/2011 | |
17 | CASE NO. 680/2011, 2/3 Gangster Act | ||
18 | 308 | ACQUITTED CASE NO. 68/1985 | |
19 | 307 | ACQUITTED CASE NO. 158/1988 | |
20 | 302, 34 | 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act. ACQUITTED CASE NO. 214/2000 | |
21 | ACQUITTED CASE NO. 19/01 | ||
22 | 364A, 368, 120B | Case No. 762/02,PENDING PROCEEDINGS ON BAIL (ACQUITTED) | |
23 | 3/4 GUNDA ACT CASE NO. 93/2004 PROCEEDINGS TERMINATED (ACQUITTED) | ||
24 | 382, 385, 504 | PENDING PROCEEDINGS ON BAIL (ACQUITTED) CASE NO.244/06 | |
25 | 420, 406, 467, 468 | (ACQUITTED) CASE NO. 579/2010 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.