PURULIA Constituency Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates

1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:PURULIA

Generated Friday 22nd of November 2024 01:32:35 PM

Name	Age	Party Code	Criminal Cases	Education Level	Immovable Assets	Total Liabilities	PAN Given (Y/N)
Dhiren Rajak	46	IND	No	Others	3,00,000 ~ 3 Lacs+	0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Kamakshya Prasad Singh Deo	62	AITC	No	12th Pass	22,35,000 ~ 22 Lacs+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Koushik Majumdar	34	CPM	Yes 1	Graduate	0 ~	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Naren Sahis	62	AJSU	No	10th Pass	1,00,000 ~ 1 Lacs+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Panch Kari Mukherjee	61	BJP	No	Graduate Professional	1,50,000 ~ 1 Lacs+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Sanat Sao	41	PDS	Yes 1	10th Pass	30,00,000 ~ 30 Lacs+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* Punishment for Rioting(147), Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object(149), Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions(186), Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty(333), Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty(353), Mischief by destroying or moving, etc., a land- mark fixed by public authority Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to amount of one hundred or (in case of agricultural produce) ten rupees(435), attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life or other imprisonment(511),
Sohan Rajowar	34	JMM	Yes 1	8th Pass	0 ~	0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* Punishment(143), voluntarily causing hurt(323), wrongful restraint(341), Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty(354), Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees(427),
Thuru Mahato	48	BSP	No	Not Given	20,000 ~ 20 Thou+	0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*

*143 Punishment , 147 Punishment for Rioting , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 186 Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions , 323 voluntarily causing hurt , 333 Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty , 341 wrongful restraint , 353 Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty , 354 Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty , 427 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees , 435 Mischief by destroying or moving, etc., a land- mark fixed by public authority Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to amount of one hundred or (in case of agricultural produce) ten rupees , 511 attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life or other imprisonment
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from PURULIA constituency (PURULIA).

Share On:

Download App

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs