Advanced search
Home→Jharkhand 2005

Jharkhand 2005

Election Summary

HIGHLIGHTS OF CANDIDATES
Total number of constituencies analyzed=81
Total candidates analyzed by NEW = 142
Candidates with declared criminal cases = 57 (40%)
Candidates with declared serious criminal cases = 31 (22%)
Crorepati candidates = 9 (6%)
Candidates who are graduate or above = 70 (49%)
Candidates who have not declared PAN = 62 (44%)
Total women candidates = 8 (6%)
HIGHLIGHTS OF WINNERS
 
Total winners analyzed by NEW = 69
Winners with declared criminal cases = 29 (42%)
Winners with declared serious criminal cases = 17 (25%)
Crorepati winners = 2 (3%)
Winners who are graduate or above = 35 (51%)
Winners who have not declared PAN = 25 (36%)
Total women winners = 5 (7%)

List of constituencies (District Wise)

Bokaro
1: Bermo

2: Bokaro

3: Chandankiyari

4: Gomia

Chatra
1: Chatra

2: Simaria

 
Deoghar
1: Deoghar

2: Madhupur

3: Sarath

 
Dhanbad
1: Baghmara

2: Dhanbad

3: Jharia

4: Nirsa

5: Sindri

6: Tundi

 
Dumka
1: Dumka

2: Jama

3: Jarmundi

4: Sikaripara

East Singhbhum
1: Baharagora

2: Ghatsila

3: Jamshedpur East

4: Jamshedpur West

5: Jugsalai

6: Potka

 
Garhwa
1: Bhawanathpur

2: Garhwa

 
Giridih
1: Bagodar

2: Dhanwar

3: Dumri

4: Gandey

5: Giridih

6: Jamua

 
Godda
1: Godda

2: Mahagama

3: Poreyahat

 
Gumla
1: Bishunpur

2: Gumla

3: Sisai

 
Hazaribagh
1: Barhi

2: Barkagaon

3: Barkatha

4: Hazaribagh

5: Mandu

6: Ramgarh

 
Jamtara
1: Jamtara

2: Nala

 
Koderma
1: Kodarma

 
Latehar
1: Latehar

2: Manika

 
Lohardaga
1: Lohardaga

 
Pakur
1: Litipara

2: Maheshpur

3: Pakaur

 
Palamu
1: Bishrampur

2: Chhatarpur

3: Daltonganj

4: Hussainabad

5: Panki

 
Ranchi
1: Hatia

2: Kanke

3: Khijri

4: Khunti

5: Mandar

6: Ranchi

7: Silli

8: Tamar

9: Torpa

 
Sahebganj
1: Barhait

2: Borio

3: Rajmahal

 
Seraikella Kharsawan
1: Ichagarh

2: Kharsawan

3: Seraikella

 
Simdega
1: Kolebira

2: Simdega

 
West Singhbhum
1: Chaibasa

2: Chakradharpur

3: Jaganathpur

4: Majhgaon

5: Manoharpur

 

Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.